FCA's board requirements won't curtail another Woodford

Changes to fund boards not enough to make a difference

clock • 3 min read

Fund investors are likely feeling besieged. The travails of Woodford are highlighting some of the weaknesses of the "self-advised" market - with accusations swirling as to who is responsible.

Retail investors - being non-experts generally - look to fund platforms to provide ideas for their portfolios. While Hargreaves Lansdown was clearly tardy in taking Woodford's largest fund off its recommended lists, it had at least identified the issues with the fund, namely its unquoted allocation and the subsequent liquidity challenge it represented. That Woodford had these liquidity issues in the first place though, points to a serious problem with the fund's governance. Update: Woodford calls Equity Income fund's transparency 'damaging' as fund suspension continues According to th...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

More on Funds

Trustpilot