Comment: Who is judging the judges on fund selection and ratings?

katrina Baugh
clock • 5 min read

The implementation of the RDR was intended to stamp-out bias in the area of investment advice.

Three years on, although adviser charging structures have changed, the fall-out (foreseen by some) of the RDR and other regulations has been to create a new kind of 'bias'. In many ways, this is also more dangerous as it is less obvious than the problems created by commission payments. As we know, the burden of regulation has pushed more advisers into outsourcing their investment decisions and into the hands of a select number of gatekeepers, who are estimated to control between 50% to 70% of flows in the UK (many would suggest the reality is nearer the higher end). This in turn has l...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

More on Regulation

Trustpilot