Mumford: Do we need passives in these stagnant markets?

PASSIVES

clock • 3 min read

I was quite amazed to read in the papers that passive investment is the way forward in the present market environment, and some fund management houses are even launching cautious funds.

Why, when for the past three years the FTSE 100 has in effect been ‘range bound’, moving been the 5,000 and 6,000 levels? It is a well-known fact investors tend to wait for markets to rise for some time before committing to equities, and in many cases they buy just when companies and funds investing in them have become ’expensive’. But after three years of ‘stagnation’ in the markets, and the flight to bonds, what is still driving advisers and their clients to be so cautious? There are plenty of opportunities to invest in funds and companies that are providing both attractive dividend...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

More on Investment

Trustpilot