IMA issues alternatives to 'perverse' changes to FSCS funding

Natalie Kenway
clock

The IMA has issued a series of alternatives to the FSA's "perverse" proposed changes to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), having previously criticised its unfair treatment of asset managers.

In July, the regulator published proposals to eliminate cross-subsidies between asset managers and deposit takers and offer more certainty in the level of fees they pay towards the FSCS. Costs would be split between deposit takers and insurers, who would be regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). Asset managers would be regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), with no cross subsidy between the two. The IMA said this means banks and insurers face no potential liability in the event of mis-selling of their products by an intermediary, only making them liable i...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

Trustpilot