The FSA's recent decision to maintain the widely unpopular RU64 shows the regulator's alarming knack...
The FSA's recent decision to maintain the widely unpopular RU64 shows the regulator's alarming knack of second guessing itself when it comes to pensions. As the ABI commented, it is also difficult to reconcile with the much-vaunted drive towards a principles-based regulatory regime. The rule basically requires an adviser to explain to clients in writing why a personal pension recommendation is at least as suitable as a stakeholder scheme. After delaying the call on its future for the best part of two years, the FSA finally decided there is not a sufficient case for removing the rule. In...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes