So far Revenue & Customs has interpreted the Pre-Owned Assets Tax legislation generously, but it is too early to measure its effectiveness and fairness
In late 2003 the Inland Revenue lost the Eversden case which exploited an anomaly in the inheritance tax gift with reservation rules. Relatively simple trust structures were increasingly being used to shelter family homes from inheritance tax. The Government reacted by changing the rules and introduced a new tax charge - colloquially known as Pre-Owned Asset Tax (Poat) - to counter the potentially significant loss of tax revenue. Poat is an income tax charge levied on benefits received by a previous owner of certain categories of assets. The tax charge applies to individuals rather than c...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes