We all know you should not smoke and should only drink in moderation.
Whereas some people live a temperate life, others do both to excess and die at the same age because of genetics. It is not fair, but it is how things are; what is OK for one person is toxic for another, even in small doses. It is with a growing sense of perplexity we have watched governments and managers struggling with the idea there is some kind of quick fix for our indulgence and that the toxic debt that is the financial equivalent of beer and cigarettes has had no real effect on banks and consumers. The real question is: how toxic have things become for our banks? In order to see ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes