Why the differing performance between ITs and 'sister' funds?

INVESTMENT TRUSTS

clock • 4 min read

Why are there often such differences in the performance of investment trusts and open-ended counterparts run by the same managers, asks James Burns, head of the multi-manager team at Smith & Williamson.

The investment companies sector has proved itself to be durable and adaptable over its almost 150 year history. This is demonstrated best by its oldest constituent, Foreign & Colonial. It was originally launched in 1868 as a bond fund before transforming into an equity fund, and latterly into its current guise as one of a long-only equity proposition enhanced by significant exposure to private equity. More recently, the demand for yield and the retrenchment of banks from various areas of the market has led to a proliferation of alternative asset classes being made available to retail ...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

More on Investment Trusts

Trustpilot