Graham Bentley: Why multi-asset fund risk labels are essentially meaningless

Investment not about risk but uncertainty

clock • 5 min read

The multi-asset sector is a mess. Risk suffixes such as 'targeted', 'profiled', 'rated' and so on are so loosely applied to funds as to make them meaningless - and potentially misleading.

Only a minority of funds are managed to a volatility target - and even they are loath to state the targets in their objectives. As I suggested last time, most ‘risk-labelled' funds pay no more than a passing marketing reference to risk targeting, so best you ignore the labels. In fact, you might want to ignore volatility altogether. Volatility is measured by standard deviation - in fact, let's use ‘SD' to keep my word count down. SD tells us how by much members of a group - in our case historical price movements - differ from their average. On a chart, a ‘normal' distribution of value...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

Trustpilot