News - Economics / markets
Categories: Economics / Markets
Topics: Commodities | Ftse 100 | Ftse all-share | Gold | Gilts | Treasury
Investors should have been buying portfolios of gilts, treasuries and bunds, as well as commodities, while avoiding major indices, to maximise returns in 2011.
A global sell-off of risk assets since the summer, sparked by the eurozone crisis, has caused major indices to plunge, prompting investors to pile into the few safe havens left standing.
Data compiled for Investment Week shows both gilts and treasuries, as well as bunds, have delivered double-digit total returns since the start of the year, while most major equity markets have declined.
Below we reveal some of the top performing assets, and those you should have avoided, so far in 2011 (all data compiled between 31.12.10 - 18.11.11 by Morningstar and Fidelity).
10-yr UK gilts total return (£): 15.47%
10-yr German bunds total return (£): 12.08%
10-yr US treasuries total return: ($) 14.44%
And a few government bonds to avoid:
10-yr Italian government bonds total return (£): -8.65%
10-yr Greek bond (2022 issue priced at 5.9%): -53.5%
10-yr Spanish bond (2020 issue priced at 4.85%): -1.5%
Commodities:
Gold (London fix, in $): 22.93%
Oil, Brent Crude ($): 13.46%
Equities:
Dow Jones Industrial Average: 3.43%
S&P 500: -2.38%
Paris CAC 40: - 18.17%
German DAX: -16.15%
FTSE 100: -6.04%
FTSE All Share: -6.82%
Hong Kong Hang Seng: -21.81%
Nikkei 225: -14.38%
Categories: Economics / Markets
Topics: Commodities | Ftse 100 | Ftse all-share | Gold | Gilts | Treasury
Comments
The big question
Updating your subscription status
IW Fund Centre
Run in conjunction with Funds Library, the IW Fund Centre combines qualitative and quantitative data on a huge range of funds.
Have your say
This week: What will happen to the eurozone if Greece leaves?
Job of the week
Events
12 Jun 2012 - 12 Jun 2012
The Cumberland Great Cumberland Place, London W1H 7DL
05 Jul 2012 - 05 Jul 2012
Royal Albert Hall, London Kensington Gore London, Greater London SW7 2AP
but where were you actually invested
Following the FSA paper about risk most advisers have moved their clients to risk monitored managed funds.
Such funds can not take a view on asset allocation even if the world is falling apart around them because the methodology is derived from a relatively few "experts" who dictate that risk is and will in the future be related to the division of asset classes i.e. equities, fixed interest & property. This methodology is bought by the increasing number of fund of fund managers so they can badge their funds as risk rated to meet the FSA guidance.
It is interesting to read this article which gives us a hindsight view but in the future who would ever stick their neck out far enough away from the carefully cultivated managed risk sectors to benefit from the sectors mentioned even if they had a good hunch?
Posted by: Elaine Birch
22 Nov 2011 | 15:42
Complain about this comment