News - Investment
Categories: Investment
Topics: Hargreaves lansdown
Hargreaves Lansdown said the FSA's proposed rule changes to platforms will have "no material impact" on its business as its shares fell sharply in early trading.
The FSA said in yesterday's platform paper it wants to ban payments from fund managers to platforms and cash rebates to consumers.
Hargreaves shares were down 10.7% or 62p, to 518p, at 10.30am, after a note from Citigroup warned the FSA's proposals could mean Hargreaves may need to overhaul its business model.
Analysts at Citigroup said Hargreaves Lansdown's Vantage fund platform receives payments from fund managers and passes some of them on to investors as a "loyalty bonus".
The broker said the change of stance from the FSA, which in an earlier consultation paper said it would allow fund manager rebates, is likely to require significant changes to Hargreaves' model.
The broker points out in the first half of 2010, net Vantage Commission revenues accounted for around 35% of Hargreaves' group revenues.
"We believe somebody must pay for these services, and if it is not the fund management firms, it will have to be retail investors. This is a significant model change not just for HL but for the entire industry," Citigroup says.
However, it also advised clients to buy the stock on any weakness as the new rules are likely to result in a change in the source of revenue, rather than lost revenue.
Hargreaves issued a statement following the sharp share price falls, stating it will see "no material impact" from the FSA's platform proposals.
"We have concluded all changes proposed in the FSA paper required by 31 December 2012 will require little work for Hargreaves Lansdown to implement and will result in no material impact on our business," the firm said.
"We particularly support the new regulatory requirement for re-registration in stock, which needed regulatory intervention. Although we would like to see wider application than is currently proposed, Hargreaves Lansdown has long been a major supporter of investment portability for retail clients.
"Hargreaves Lansdown already uses a range of proven revenue models. We can apply any of these to the fund market and still provide a competitive, low cost, high quality execution only service. As such we are relaxed about both the short and long term outcomes of any revenue model changes and any additional disclosure."
Hargreaves added it will continue to seek the best outcome for retail investors in dialogue with the FSA.
The FSA said in yesterday's platform paper it would be including execution-only services, like Hargreaves' Vantage platform, under some of its new rules, particularly those relating to disclosure of deals with third parties like fund managers.
Its paper reads: "...only COBS 6.1E applies to the execution-only services themselves. COBS 6.1E.1R requires the disclosure to a retail or professional client of any fees or commission a platform arranges to accept from a third party.
"The guidance in COBS 6.1E.2G says that if a platform service provider accepts such a fee or commission, it should pay due regard to its obligations under Principles 6 and 7 and the client's best interests rule, and ensure that it presents its retail investment products without bias."
Hargreaves has been criticised in the past for not fully disclosing its financial arrangements with fund managers including in a recent Daily Mail article.
Categories: Investment
Topics: Hargreaves lansdown
Comments
The big question
Updating your subscription status
IW Fund Centre
Run in conjunction with Funds Library, the IW Fund Centre combines qualitative and quantitative data on a huge range of funds.
Have your say
This week: What will happen to the eurozone if Greece leaves?
Job of the week
Events
12 Jun 2012 - 12 Jun 2012
The Cumberland Great Cumberland Place, London W1H 7DL
05 Jul 2012 - 05 Jul 2012
Royal Albert Hall, London Kensington Gore London, Greater London SW7 2AP
Fund managers
I'd like to echo Sir Alan Sugars views of fund managers.. If these bloody people know so much why haven’t they got yachts and private planes themselves? Why do they need to it for other people?
Posted by: Tank Dugen
02 Aug 2011 | 14:19
Complain about this comment