Go to Investment Week homepage
  • Site search
  • Job search
  • Subscribe
  • Newsletter
  • Mobile
  • RSS
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Fund Manager Views
  • Interviews
  • Sector Analysis
  • Features
  • Events
  • Audio/Video
  • Jobs
  • Research Centre
  • Share Centre
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • UK
  • Global
  • Fixed Income
  • Managed
  • Specialist
  • Markets
  • Goslings Grouse
  • Contrarian Investor
  • Leader
  • The Alchemist
  • The Big Interview
  • Fund Manager Focus
  • Funds to watch (RADAR)
  • Practical
  • Technical
  • The Big Question
  • Conjecture
Where am I? breadcrumbs arrow image Home breadcrumbs arrow image  Feature breadcrumbs arrow image Investment breadcrumbs arrow image Specialist breadcrumbs arrow image Commodities

FEATURE - COMMODITIES

Structuring UK forestry funds

18 Jan 2010 | 09:00
Alistair Campbell

Categories: Commodities

Topics: Growth | | Corporation tax

  • Tweet

Alistair Campbell looks at the niche forestry investment market and outlines its potential benefits

What are the benefits of investing in forestry?
Investment in forestry is perhaps a little out of the ordinary compared with traditional stocks, shares and bonds. However, the prospects for steady, long-term growth are excellent and the UK tax benefits are clear.

Investments in forestry also have the benefit that, as a long-term investment, if another recession should come along, it is generally possible to sit out any softness in timber prices for a few years while the crop matures and grows in volume – quite different from agriculture where one generally has to harvest at a particular time.

What is the investment strategy?
Investment in forestry is neither particularly complicated nor high risk, considering it can be regarded as an alternative or a commodity. The basic strategy is physical growth of the timber crop and a hope or expectation timber prices will at least maintain their value in real terms. As the trees grow, not only does the volume of standing timber increase but so does the unit price, as the quality and value of the timber increase with its radius.

In the UK, profits and gains derived from commercial forestry are beyond the scope of taxation. This means although no allowances are available on expenditure, commercial forestry in the UK is free from income tax, capital gains tax (other than gains on the underlying land as opposed to the timber crop), corporation tax and, if held for more than two years, inheritance tax.

How can retail investors invest?
An individual investment in commercial timber is probably uneconomic below the level of £250,000, thus excluding a decent number of investors who might like to invest at lower levels. However, there are quite a large number of potential investors who would like exposure to UK forestry but wish to invest less than this figure. For them, a collective forestry fund could be the answer. But how they are grouped together and how forestry funds are structured requires careful thought.

It is the combination of grouping investors together so the taxation benefits of investment are maintained for each individual investor that makes the forest funds business particularly interesting from a structural point of view.

How are forest fund businesses structured?
There are many structures in which investors can be grouped together. Unlike most investments, forestry in the UK is not now usually carried out through limited companies. That is because, although the limited company will itself enjoy the benefits of the tax-free nature of its profits and gains – commercial forestry not being chargeable to its corporation tax – dividends from shareholdings and gains on the sale of shares in a forestry company will be taxed in the normal way in the investor’s hands.

An efficient investment in UK forestry on a collective basis should be made through a
vehicle which is tax transparent, so all the tax-free benefits of the investment flow directly through to the individual investors. Partnerships, trusts and limited partnerships can all be used to achieve this.

For a small group of investors or a family, a general partnership may be the best way. General partnerships tend to be fairly loose structural arrangements and provide no limited liability to any of the partners. These are perhaps not practicable for more than say five investors. Where there are a small number of investors like this, the alternative is a limited liability partnership (LLP) under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000, where the partners may be involved in day-to-day management but have the benefit of limited liability.

Sometimes groupings of investors are made by way of forestry trusts – simple trusts which recognise the proportionate ownership interest of investors in the plantations. These structures can be rather unwieldy in that the investors can generally issue instructions to the trustees as to how investments should be – possibly making the trustees unhappy not only to be personally liable for their actions but also potentially to receive conflicting instructions from investors.

The most attractive structure is the traditional Limited Partnership (LP) formed under the 1907 Limited Partnership Act. Both it and the trust structure above will be Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes under Section 235 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. As such, they require an operator with authorisation from the FSA to act in this capacity.

The limited partners are prevented by the terms of the Limited Partnership Act from taking part in day-to-day running of the business and their liability is limited to the funds which they have contributed. The general partner will usually be a limited company subsidiary of the forestry manager, will have unlimited liability and will be responsible for the day-to-day business of the investment.

One further curiosity of LPs is those registered in Scotland have a legal personality of their own – that is to say they can hold property directly, and can sue and be sued in their own name. LPs registered in England have no such separate legal personality. All very academic – until a limited partner/investor defaults (for example, by not paying up sums that are due) and the LP wishes to enforce its rights. In Scotland that does not present a problem, but in England the LP may require to be dissolved before rights can be formally enforced.

Are there any time limits for investments?
The term or duration of the investment will generally be stated in the Limited Partnership Agreement. This may be anything from 10 to 20 years but the investors, often with a 75% by value vote, will also have the ability either to terminate early or extend the investment period. In some forestry funds there is a degree of liquidity in that investment managers will try to make a market matching buyers and sellers of shares of the forestry partnerships. This can be important if the investment has been held for inheritance tax relief and a death has occurred.

There are several specialist forestry investment managers present in the UK such as John Clegg and Scottish Woodlands, with the UK market leader in collective forestry funds being FIM Services Limited.

Alistair Campbell, partner, Brodies LLP

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Structuring UK forestry funds

More commoditiesnews

  • BHP Billiton profits hit by falling commodities demand

  • Xstrata shares soar on news of $80bn Glencore merger

  • Is this the commodities play of 2012?

  • JPM's Gregson sees deep value in resources after 'torturous' year

Email alerts

  • Get similar articles direct to your inbox

Related information

Recommended reading

  • Woodford ditches Tesco as Buffett buys

  • Rogers wary of US equities despite roaring markets

  • Why the eurozone has more than 12 months left

  • Conjecture: High Yield Bonds

  • Barclays shares soar despite profits fall

Categories

  • Commodities

Topics

  • growth

  • Corporation Tax

Categories: Commodities

Topics: Growth | | Corporation tax

  • Comment
  • Email to a friend
  • Print

COMMENTS

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.Post a comment

MOST COMMENTED ARTICLES

  • Spurs boss Redknapp cleared of tax evasion charges

  • FATCA: US Treasury updates proposals to ease burden

  • Woodford ditches Tesco as Buffett buys

  • Buffett: Bonds should come with a health warning

  • Investors 'twice as likely' to choose active funds over trackers - Lipper

AUDIO/VIDEO

  • Conjecture: High Yield Bonds

  • Conjecture: Global Emerging Markets

  • VIDEO: Why Japan is set for a recovery in 2012

  • Conjecture: Global Equities

  • Conjecture: Fixed Income

THE BIG QUESTION

fragment image

Every week, we ask the experts for their views on the latest topics in the industry

  • View all

EVENTS

  • fund5live

  • Senate Spring Investment Conference

  • Absolute Returns Focus 2012

  • Most read
  • Popular topics
  • Related articles
  • Woodford ditches Tesco as Buffett buys

  • Rogers wary of US equities despite roaring markets

  • Conjecture: High Yield Bonds

  • Could Ireland be this year’s recovery play?

  • Would you invest in Facebook now?

  • Close Brothers
  • IMF
  • Inflation
  • Italy
  • Portugal
  • Schroders
  • Spain
  • US
  • Warren Buffett
  • eu
  • Rathbones plans RDR-ready share class launches

  • The Big Interview: Edward Bonham Carter

  • How to choose an investment trust

  • Should Greece be allowed to go bust?

  • Woolhouse brings fresh direction to Matrix role

EDITOR'S CHOICE

1 2 3 4

hale-clive

View from the Bridge: Investment biker

Being a long time motorbiker, I am very conscious of the ever present threat that comes from being unaware of what is in front of you.

Jupiter tops Alpha Manager provider list

Jupiter Unit Trust Managers employs the most FE Alpha Managers with 12 on the newly revealed list for 2012.

lawrence-gosling

Gosling's Grouse: Baying for blood

When a phlebotomist sticks a needle in a vein you pay attention. He or she has you just where they want you.

obama-concerned

FDR, Reagan, Clinton or Obama: When were markets strongest?

Three years into Barack Obama's term as US president, how do equity market returns under this administration compare with those seen under previous leaders?

DIGITAL EDITION

fragment image

Investment Week digital edition

Register now to receive Investment Week in your inbox.

@INVESTMENTWEEK

fragment image

Follow IW on Twitter

Sign up to have all Investment Week's news and analysis tweeted straight to your timeline.
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Fund Manager Views
  • Interviews
  • Sector Analysis
  • Features
  • Events
  • Audio/Video
  • Jobs
  • Research Centre
  • Share Centre
logo

© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093

  • Site search

sponsored by

Site Credentials:

  • Contact us
  • About Incisive Media
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap

Related websites:

  • IFAonline
  • Professional Adviser
  • Mortgage Solutions
  • Retirement Planner
  • ETFM
  • International Investment
  • Professional Pensions
  • Global Pensions

Jobs:

  • Director/Executive jobs
  • Investment Adviser jobs
  • Investment Analyst jobs
  • Portfolio Manager jobs
  • Private Client Stockbroker jobs
  • Wealth Manager jobs

Accreditations:

  • Digital Publisher of the Year 2010
Tweet